We are living in an historic time. But this is not an admirable observation- America is experiencing an economic disaster of the century. The national unemployment rate is escalating to depressing levels every month, millions are losing their homes and monetary livelihood, and oil prices continue to fluctuate at ridiculous and atrocious rates. Yet we’ve created these hellish catastrophes. “We can no longer afford indifference to suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world’s resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it,” our 44th President declared in his 2009 Inauguration Speech in Washington, D.C. (Obama’s 2009 Inauguration Speech.) It’s no wonder that the recurring cliche about reliving the Great Depression does not seem so exagerrated anymore. These economic nightmares are consequences of decades of American greed and ignorance.
In light of these grievances, many concerned citizens are wondering, should the United States Federal Government focus on moving towards a clean energy economy by promoting green jobs?
Technically, “green jobs” are as old as the human race. Our first ancestors in the Mesopotamian area were hunters and gatherers, depending on the males of the community to hunt meat to feed the rest of the tribe. Women harvested the earth, taking advantage of the vegetation and the water supply. With the Stone Age came the use of primitive agricultural techniques to harvest resources. These agricultural advances included using stone tools to dig holes to plant grain, building wooden shadoofs by the river’s edge to retrieve buckets of water in ancient Egyptian society, and using large plows to manually dig impressive and critical irrigation systems to bring water to the community for public and agricultural use. The Greeks and later the French designed and built elaborate stone aqueducts to transfer water from far-reaching moutainous sources. Usually, the water would travel for miles along these man-made corridors before it reached its communal destination. The water from these aqueducts used in public baths was manually heated by an enormous underground rock furnace. Many of these very aqueduct systems have withstood the test of time, and are still in use to this day. The windmill appeared during the middle ages, a powerful wind energy resource still heavily used by modern farmers. All of these early civilizations were conscious about the importance of having a working system to distribute food resources to the rest of the community in order to survive. Therefore, these primeval regimes made it mandatory for a certain number of citizens to labor in and maintain these systems. They realized the importance of having an established standard for preserving and advancing these laborious jobs. Is it possible that we can learn from their historical examples?
Individual American states have already taken proactive initiatives by utilizing the most readily available resource: American citizens. The city of Oakland, CA proudly has a working and effective Green Jobs Corps. Interested residents can enroll for free classes that offer green job training through Peralta Community College District, a network of community colleges working together to promote the green collar cause (Source #7.) Baltimore, Maryland is making an organizational effort to preserve the future of low-income youth, ex-convincts, and underprivileged teens by offering an all-encompassing green job training program targeted towards these individuals (Source #28.) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania has a growing network of green businesses that sells sustainable products and services (Source #32.) These areas are all operating on one unifying purpose. Green jobs have the potential to address most, if not all, of our economic problems.
First and foremost, converting to a new clean energy economy would create jobs (Source #26.) Thus far, we have been relying on foreign oil and burning destructive amounts of fossil fuels to meet our energy and consumption demands (Source #9.) By abandoning dependence on these factors in exchange for a greener economy, we would be creating millions of new jobs to jump start the beginnings of a modern green sector. These jobs will not only address the current unemployment crisis, they are jobs that will remain stable for generations to come if we are serious about converting to a new economic arrangement (Source #13.) Second, green jobs are local. Every state, city, community, and neighborhood is dependent on energy and food supply. We need energy to cook our foods, to keep us heated during the winter season, and to advance our technological education. These are issues that demand immediate and local attention. Creating green jobs to fulfill these needs is a way of survival. Third, by converting to new, greener methods of harvesting energy, we are saving money, plain and simple. We would no longer be at mercy to oil barons or Exxon corporations to meet all of our energy needs. The money we save by withdrawing our financing of these institutions can be invested in the new green sector. This would include investing in creating a green training and instruction curriculum for the public education system, investing in green community career development programs, and investing in research and development for sustainable technologies and methods (Source #22.) Taking these steps to promote green jobs and green practices decreases carbon emissions, global warming, offenses against the environment, unemployment, and our utility bills.
That’s the gist of a green economy. But aren’t there competing ideas for accomplishing these progressive goals? Realistically, does everyone think it’s easy to be green? Some argue that converting to such an economy would lead to a system of “cap and trade.” (Source #17.) Basically, cap and trade is where governmental regulations are established to limit the amount of carbon emissions a plant or business can produce. If one manufacturer reaches the maximum limit, it can “buy” more carbon-emitting rights from another business or company. The selling organization is then free to use the profit any which way it pleases. But some environmentalists, especially those of the renown Apollo Alliance, advocate for a system of “cap and invest.” This is when instead of having the free choice to spend the money on anything, the selling party circulates the extra finances back into the green economy, whether it be towards research and development, installation, or any other green economic venture that would benefit its business (Source #10.) Or, we can just focus on trading in all of our gas-guzzling vehicles for hybrids, and call our contribution towards preserving our environment good. That sounds much quicker and easier than changing everything about our decades-old over-consuming, carbon-emitting lifestyles. But is quicker and easier the best option in this catastrophic state of our country? We tried the quick and easy route with tax cuts- look where that got us today. All Bush-bashing aside, it is obviously going to take much more than an immediate, one-time Band-Aide to get us out of this fiscal and commercial abyss we’ve ultimately fallen into.
So, should the United States Federal Government focus on moving towards a clean energy economy by promoting green jobs? Absolutely. However, there are still antagonists against such a reformist conversion.
One argument opponents- namely those who classify themselves as “right-wing- are using is the age-old three-word excuse, “It’s too expensive.” A second argument, this one more semantic, is articulated in a post by blogger Joel Makower entitled, “Will Green Jobs become the New Green Wash?” (Source #18.) One aspect of this argument says that since the term “green job” has not been officially defined, there will be no measures or standards for determining when a green job has been created, or when one has been maintained. Also according to Makower’s argument, since the terminology has not been finalized, it is impossible to even know exactly what a green job is. Yet another argument against a green job revolution is that many of these jobs put human safety at risk, and some do not even pay well (Source #23.)
However, even with these counter-arguments against building a green economy, there are answers and there are solutions to all of the above concerns. My sincere hope is that I will be able to effectively communicate the logicality and the urgency of moving towards an American green revolution at the conclusion of this project.
SUMMARY OF MY 30 BEST SOURCES (OUT OF 33:)
Journalistic 1- The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/20green.html?scp=6&sq=green%20jobs&st=cse
Journalistic 2- Emagazine.com
http://www.emagazine.com/view/?3943&src=
Journalistic 3- Philadelphia Weekly
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/articles/1552
Journalistic 4- Los Angeles Times
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/24/business/fi-greentech24
Journalistic 5- The Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/07/04/donning_a_green_collar/
Institutional 1- Environment News Service
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2009/2009-02-27-01.asp
Institutional 2-National Center for Healthy Housing
http://www.nchh.org/Policy/Policy-Projects/Green-Building-Analysis.aspx
Institutional 3- Worldchanging.com
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009461.html
Institutional 4- The Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/09/browner-green-jobs-jeopar_n_165406.html
Institutional 5- East Bay Business Times
http://eastbay.bizjournals.com/eastbay/stories/2008/08/11/daily53.html
Academic Research 1- Institute for Energy Research
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2009/01/27/ier-offers-economic-stimulus-plan-urges-president-obama-to-adopt-historic-change/
Academic Research 2- World Watch Institute
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6006
Academic Research 3- RenewableEnergyWorld.com
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/09/report-global-green-job-market-expected-to-explode-53686
Academic Research 4- Center for American Progress
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/01/energizing_the_economy.html
Academic Research 5- Apollo News Service
http://apolloalliance.org/green-collar-jobs/reports-green-collar-jobs/assure-green-jobs-are-good-jobs/
Citizen (Interview 1)- Matt Keating, Eugene MoveOn Coordinator
http://chocolatedragon.wordpress.com/
Citizen (Interview 2)- Laura Uhler, Business Owner of Solar Ki
http://chocolatedragon.wordpress.com/
Citizen (Interview 3)- Mac Lynch, Program Associate of the Apollo Alliance
http://chocolatedragon.wordpress.com/
Citizen Blog 1- Desmogblog.com
http://www.desmogblog.com/big-money-behind-americans-prosperity
Citizen Blog 2- PRWeb Press Release News Wire
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/02/prweb2086724.htm
Citizen Blog 3- The Conservative Xpress
http://conservativexpress.blogspot.com/2009/02/obamas-cap-and-trade-energy-plan-may.html
Still Image 1- Center for American Progress
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/01/energizing_the_economy.html
Still Image 2- Green Collar Careers: Insight on Jobs in the Growing Sustainable Business Industry
http://greencollar.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/ases-map.jpg
Still Image 3- UNEP/GRID- Arendal
http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/overview_of_renewable_energy_sources
Still Image 4- Earth Policy Institute
http://www.earthpolicy.org/Indicators/CO2/2008_Carbon%20Emissions%201751-2006%20SMALL.GIF
Still Image 5- RenewableEnergyWorld.com
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/09/report-global-green-job-market-expected-to-explode-53686
Multimedia 1- KeithCarsonDistrict5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4xiLQoRELc
Multimedia 2- Texomashomepage.com
http://texomashomepage.com/content/fulltext/?cid=32051
Multimedia 3- Ecotrust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNLd8g42Bo0
Multimedia 4- Workingfilms.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp979n502RM
Institutional 6- The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081117/green_jobs